Do nothing about your appearance because critics claim nothing works, or do something to reverse sagging skin, excess body fat build up and cellulite dimpling?
Are dimpled thighs, double chins or sagging loose skin around your stomach really going to miraculously tighten up due to treatment by any of the new high-tech and highly marketed skin rejuvenation therapies?
Scientists and skeptics will argue that cause-and-effect relationships between alleged skin tightening therapies like laser dermabrasion or the radio frequency based Thermage or Titan are simply too weak to demonstrate conclusively across a wide population.
Not surprisingly, the real story is complex with some wrinkle reduced winners and some sagging skin losers arguing strongly about these New Age saggy skin therapies.
What The Smoother Skin Winners Say - Voting With Their Pocketbooks. The current crop of baby boomers are individually putting out thousands of dollars for skin rejuvenation treatments, and combined are spending almost $4.3 billion dollars in 2006 for the full spectrum of body shaping procedures. Big trend setters are those non invasive non surgical body contouring devices.
Clearly, lasers and their satisfied customers agree that this cold-light technology can stimulate collagen production, tighten loose saggy skin. Otherwise, the market wouldn't pay out these sort of monies, like $2,500 for a Thermage face lift and neck sagging skin treatment.
The Winners also point out that these non surgical therapies benefit customers through lower costs, no surgical health risks, no down time and loss of salary or vacation time.
What The Sagging Skin Losers Think. Here's the straight talk from industry skeptics. Insufficient clinical evidence exists to show the sort of predicted result claimed by the medical device promoters. Results in terms of reducing sagging skin are variable and random, rather than straight-line and predictable.
Worse, these critics tout that the alleged skin tightening results reflect swelling or inflammatory response rather than actual collage stimulation, or repairing skin laxity.
Their further argument is that the laser and other light-energy device makers rely on selective before-and-after photos, cherry picking results from the success end of the therapy spectrum rather than showing the miniscule typical candidate.